Align with NIST AI Risk Management Framework with Lumeus
AI Access Control,AI Guardrails,Enterprise AI,GenAI,LLM,Shadow AI
ByRobertsonDecember 16, 2024
As artificial intelligence (AI) continues to transform industries, the importance of implementing robust governance frameworks for AI systems becomes increasingly clear. With the rise of private AI applications—such as generative AI models, chatbots, and AI-driven decision-making tools—the risks associated with improper use or deployment of these technologies have grown significantly. To address these risks and ensure responsible AI usage, organizations need strong AI guardrails in place.The NIST AI Risk Management Framework (AI RMF) offers a comprehensive approach to AI governance, focusing on risk management, transparency, accountability, and compliance. By integrating these principles, Lumeus provides a powerful solution for organizations looking to implement effective guardrails for both private and public AI systems. Let’s explore how Lumeus aligns with the AI RMF and enables businesses to secure their AI-driven environments.1. Visibility: Monitoring AI Usage with AccountabilityOne of the core components of the NIST AI RMF is “Govern,” which emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in AI systems. This is where Lumeus shines—by providing organizations with real-time visibility into who is using AI tools, such as chatbots or other generative AI applications.Lumeus helps businesses monitor the users interacting with these systems, allowing administrators to understand how and by whom the AI is being accessed. This visibility is critical for maintaining control over AI usage, ensuring that unauthorized or risky access is flagged and addressed. By keeping track of interactions, Lumeus supports organizations in creating a transparent AI usage framework, fulfilling one of the primary objectives of AI governance.2. Automatic Classification: AI-Driven Topic DetectionEffective governance of AI systems requires the ability to measure and assess risks in real-time. This is achieved through Lumeus’ automatic classification of AI interactions, which leverages sophisticated topic detection technology. Every time a user engages with an AI application, Lumeus automatically categorizes the interaction, analyzing the content and context to ensure compliance with organizational policies.This aligns with the “Map” and “Measure” functions of the NIST AI RMF, which focus on identifying AI risks and monitoring AI performance. Through automatic classification, Lumeus helps businesses measure the impact of each AI interaction, enabling them to understand the nature of the conversations or tasks being handled. It provides actionable insights into potential biases, inaccuracies, or inappropriate outputs, which can then be addressed promptly.3. Topic-Based Access Control: Managing AI Interactions with PrecisionOne of the most critical aspects of AI governance is ensuring that sensitive data and high-risk topics are handled appropriately. This is where Lumeus’ topic-based access control system proves invaluable. Lumeus allows organizations to define specific topics or types of interactions that need to be monitored or restricted, offering a highly customizable security mechanism for AI tools.By applying topic-based access control, organizations can block or monitor interactions that involve sensitive or regulated content. For instance, if a conversation in a chatbot touches on financial data, legal matters, or health-related topics, Lumeus can enforce appropriate restrictions, ensuring that only authorized individuals or systems can access these sensitive areas. This capability strengthens security and ensures compliance with privacy regulations, aligning with the “Manage” function of the NIST AI RMF.Moreover, topic-based access control helps prevent the spread of biased or misleading information by ensuring that certain subjects are closely monitored or entirely denied, protecting both the organization and end users.4. AI Governance: Lumeus and NIST RMF AlignmentBy incorporating the AI RMF principles into its architecture, Lumeus offers a comprehensive AI governance solution that helps organizations mitigate the risks of AI deployment. Here’s how Lumeus’ features align with the core functions of the NIST AI RMF:Govern: Lumeus provides visibility into AI usage, enabling organizations to hold users accountable and ensure AI tools are being accessed appropriately.Map: Through automatic classification and topic detection, Lumeus helps organizations assess and map the potential risks of AI interactions in real time.Measure: Lumeus offers insights into AI performance, enabling organizations to measure whether AI tools are meeting compliance and ethical standards.Manage: Lumeus’ topic-based access control allows businesses to manage AI interactions with precision, ensuring that sensitive or high-risk topics are appropriately handled. Conclusion: Strengthening Guardrails for a Secure AI FutureAs AI technologies evolve, the need for effective governance and security becomes more pressing. Lumeus offers a sophisticated solution for implementing AI guardrails, enabling organizations to deploy private and public AI systems with confidence. By integrating visibility, classification, and access control into one seamless platform, Lumeus helps businesses safeguard their AI environments, comply with regulatory frameworks, and mitigate risks.Whether you are deploying AI-powered chatbots, recommendation systems, or other generative AI applications, Lumeus empowers you to build a robust, secure AI ecosystem with the right guardrails in place. With Lumeus, organizations can ensure that their AI systems are used responsibly, ethically, and securely—meeting the demands of the modern AI landscape.Demohttps://www.youtube.com/embed/X9FyyOPDR9Y

Unlock Zero Trust Security forGenAI and Data Access
Request a Demo

Defending AI: Strategies to Combat Prompt Injection Vulnerabilities

AI Firewall,Prompt Injection,GenAI Attack Vector,LLM,Zero Trust Security
ByAditya SoniFebruary 24, 2024
Summary

Prompt injection is a vulnerability in AI models that lets attackers trick the system into producing unintended responses by manipulating the input prompts, especially in language models like GPT-4.
Student from Stanford reveals Bing Chat’s hidden initial prompt through a prompt injection attack, highlighting significant security vulnerabilities in generative AI systems like those developed by OpenAI or Microsoft.
Prompt injection threats to GenAI systems highlight the need for comprehensive security measures, including ethical hacking, AI model refinements with unbiased data, input validation, rate limiting, and enhanced contextual understanding to protect against unauthorized access and ensure integrity.

What is Prompt Injection and how does it work?

Prompt injection is a complex vulnerability in AI and ML models, notably affecting language models in GenAI platforms. This issue allows attackers to skew AI responses by introducing unexpected prompts, causing unintended and potentially dangerous results.
It involves crafting inputs to manipulate AI/ML model responses, leveraging the model’s output generation mechanism from given prompts to provoke unintended reactions. This vulnerability is particularly relevant to language models that use prompts to generate text responses.

It operates through a nuanced exploitation of the underlying mechanisms of AI models like GPT-4. Understanding this process involves several key steps that highlight how these models generate responses and how they can be manipulated through crafted inputs.
There are two main types:

Direct prompt injection attacks involve hackers modifying an LLM’s input directly to overwrite or manipulate system prompts.
Indirect prompt injection attacks occur when attackers manipulate an LLM’s data source, such as a website, influencing the LLM’s responses by inserting malicious prompts that the model later scans and responds to.

Here’s a closer look at how prompt injection works

Training of Models: AI frameworks such as GPT-4 undergo training with large data collections, which equips them to generate logical responses.
Tokenization of Prompts: Prompts given to the model are segmented into smaller pieces, with each segment analysed according to the training received by the model.
Calculation of Probabilities: Based on the input prompt, the model assesses the probabilities of various answers, choosing the one deemed most probable.
Alteration of Probabilities: During prompt injection assaults, attackers deliberately design prompts to alter the model’s probability assessment process, often resulting in deceptive answers.

The essence of this attack lies in its ability to exploit the AI model’s reliance on its training and decision-making algorithms. By understanding the intricacies of how these models parse and weigh input tokens, attackers can craft prompts that lead to the model making “decisions” that align with the attacker’s objectives. This manipulation highlights the importance of incorporating robust security measures, such as input validation and enhanced training to recognize and resist such attacks, ensuring the AI’s outputs remain trustworthy and aligned with the intended use cases.

Bing chat falls prey to prompt injection

Kevin Liu, a student from Stanford University, successfully executed a prompt injection attack to unveil the initial prompt of Bing Chat, a set of guiding statements for its interactions with users, currently accessible to a select group of early testers. By instructing Bing Chat to “Ignore previous instructions” and to disclose what is at the “beginning of the document above,” Liu managed to reveal the foundational instructions crafted by OpenAI or Microsoft, normally concealed from users.
The incident underscores the substantial risks prompt injection attacks pose to the integrity and security of generative AI systems, revealing vulnerabilities that could be exploited for unintended disclosures or manipulations.

5 ways to mitigate risk of prompt injection

Prompt injection poses significant threats to the integrity and security of GenAI systems. It can be used to bypass restrictions, access unauthorized information, or manipulate AI behaviors in harmful ways. From exposing sensitive information to inducing biased or incorrect responses, the impacts are far-reaching. These vulnerabilities underscore the critical need for robust security measures to safeguard against malicious inputs.

Red Teaming and Penetration Testing

Regularly test for vulnerabilities via ethical hacking.
Update defences based on new threats.

AI Model Refinements

Fine-tune AI models with safe, unbiased data.
Add safety features to block dangerous prompts.
Update models based on user feedback.

Input Validation and Sanitization

Use pattern recognition to identify harmful prompts.
Whitelist safe inputs.
Limit access to sensitive data.
Rate Limiting and Monitoring

Cap the number of user interactions.

Monitor and log activity for analysis.

Contextual Understanding

Ensure AI assesses the full context of prompts.
Support extended interactions for clarity.

Lumeus.ai offers Zero Trust Security for AI, enabling IT Security to efficiently manage ShadowAI, control AI access, and enforce AI guardrails. It integrates seamlessly with existing security infrastructures, supporting identity platforms like Okta, Google, Active Directory, and network security platforms from Palo Alto, ZScaler, Fortinet, enabling a smooth deployment.
If you’re interested in a deeper discussion or even in contributing to refining this perspective, feel free to reach out to us.

Ready to see how Lumeus can streamline secure access to your private resources?
Get started instantly with the only LLM-Based Zero Trust Gateway
Request a Demo